The concept of mediation is sought to be brought into the statute book by the legislature in the new Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (notified but not yet enforced). Recently, in November 2019, the central government issued draft rules with respect to mediation (“Mediation Rules”). This update seeks to highlight the salient features of the Mediation Rules.
 
A.    Mediation Cell
 
a.    A Mediation Cell is to be set up by the consumer forums which shall have a panel of Mediators and shall also comprise of other supporting staff for providing administrative assistance.
 
b.    A Mediation Cell shall be competent to deal with ongoing disputes as well as disputes which have not yet been initiated by the complainant. Therefore, Mediation Rules even provide for ‘pre litigation’ mediation. In other words, a complainant may approach the mediation cell of the appropriate forum even prior to institution of a case against the opposite party. This concept of ‘pre litigation’ mediation seems to have been adopted from the recent commercial courts law which has been introduced in civil courts for the purpose of resolving commercial disputes between parties.
 
B.     The Excepted Matters
 
Certain categories of matters are excluded from the scope of mediation and the Mediation Cells are refrained from entertaining such matters. In general, matters relating to offences which are not compoundable under any law cannot be settled in mediation. A few such matters beyond the purview of mediation proceedings are as follows:
 
a.       Matters relating to proceedings in respect of medical negligence resulting in grievous injury or death;
 
b.      Matters which relate to defaults or offences for which applications for compounding have been made by one or more parties;
 
c.       cases involving serious and specific allegations of fraud, fabrication of documents forgery, impersonation, coercion etc;
 
d.      Cases involving prosecution for criminal and non-compoundable offences;
 
e.       Cases which involve public interest or interest of numerous persons who are not parties before the consumer forum.
 
It is noteworthy that the given list is not exhaustive and is merely illustrative.
 
C.    Mediator Immunity
 
Mediators are provided immunity against any action taken by him in good faith during the mediation proceedings, including from civil and criminal proceedings.
 
D.    Status and effect of settlement agreement
 
Every order made by the consumer forum endorsing the settlement agreement (arrived at between the parties pursuant to mediation proceedings) shall be considered to be a decree of a civil court and shall be final and binding on signatory parties. No appeal shall lie from such order.
 
Further, a settlement agreement arrived at between the parties shall be enforceable even on the legal representatives of the parties (in case of demise of any party). In case of demise of a party during the continuation of the mediation proceedings, the mediator so appointed and conducting the proceedings will continue his role for the remainder of the mediation process.
 
E.     Scope of Communication
 
The Mediation Rules postulate limited scope of communication between the Mediator and the forum. The intent behind this is to preserve the confidence of contesting parties as well as the neutrality of the Mediator. In case any communication is necessary, then the same shall be made in writing with copies of the same to the parties concerned. In fact, the communication is limited to the following situations/circumstances:
 
i)        About the failure of a party to attend the mediation proceedings;
 
ii)      About consent of the parties;
iii)    Regarding the assessment of the Mediator for cases which may be unsuitable for mediation; and
 
iv)    About settlement of the dispute.
 
F.      Refund of Court Fee
 
Just like in civil cases, in matters which are settled by parties through mediation, the complainant would be entitled to a refund of court fee. 
 
G.    Arbitral/Judicial proceedings
 
Parties to ongoing mediation proceedings would be prevented from initiating any arbitral or judicial proceedings during the continuation of such proceedings except in the limited situation where an order of the court is necessary to protect any interest of the parties therein. This rule would largely apply to ‘pre litigation’ mediations.